Nomination Form

The summary should provide a condensed overview of the key elements of the nomination in no more than 750 characters. The executive summary of gold recipients will be translated and included in the Awards Showcase, on the CICan website.

Evidence of significant and verifiable impact on the institution, as well as on student life and on the greater community at large. (40 points)

Evidence that the nominee or team has made an important contribution through community involvement in developing the institution’s positive image. (25 points)

Assurance that these leadership skills have been consistently evidenced over no less than 12 months and have had a sustainable effect on the institution. (20 points)

Verifiable evidence that the student’s or students’ grade point average is at or above the mean in the program in which they are registered. Includes a descriptive summary (awards received, participation in committees, etc.). (15 points)

The nominee or team has shown a consistent commitment to student success and to developing methodologies, materials, and processes which have contributed to student success. (20 points)

The nominee or team has provided a leadership role model for teaching colleagues and students. (20 points)

The nominee’s or team’s work has had a recognized and substantial impact on students (employment, success rate), colleagues (through professional development and example) and the institution (reputation in the subject area). (20 points)

The nominee’s or team’s commitment has been broadly evident over their career to date. (20 points)

One of the nominee’s or team’s strengths is the ability to adapt teaching styles, methodologies, or materials to fit student needs and available resources. (20 points)

The nominee or team has had a significant, positive and verifiable impact on his/her institution and, thus, the internal and external communities it serves. (25 points)

The nominee or team has shown leadership in working with external community partners. (20 points)

The nominee or team has involved others in activities and provided a motivational influence. (20 points)

Evidence of creativity has been shown in meeting challenges with available resources. (15 points)

There is evidence of a significant contribution to the institution’s positive image in the internal and external communities it serves. (10 points)

Evidence that these leadership skills have been consistently applied over an extended period. (10 points)

Evidence that the nominee or team has had a significant, positive and verifiable impact on her/his institution and the greater community at large. (30 points)

Evidence that the nominee or team has involved others in activities and provided a motivational influence. (25 points)

The nominee or team has demonstrated exemplary performance of duties and has contributed overall to the institution through involvement on committees, volunteer work, etc. The institution, students and community at large have benefited from their participation, contributions and involvement in activities, both internally and externally. (25 points)

Evidence of creativity in meeting challenges with available resources. (20 points)

Data driven evidence that the program has been effective with learners and has reached or surpassed its objectives. (25 points)

Evidence that the program involves several institutional constituents (faculty, students, staff, administration and governors) and at least one external industry or community partner. (20 points)

The program is meeting a long term substantial need and serves a group of learners over a significant period. (20 points)

Evidence of innovative practices in an existing program or the creation of a new program in response to a learning need not adequately being met. Programs nominated for this Award are not commonly available in this format across the college/institute system. (20 points)

Ease of transfer of content and/or delivery mode to other institutions. The program does not rely on the existence of unique infrastructure or geographic location and can be offered in another location or region. (15 points)

The mandate to serve Indigenous learners and communities is embedded in colleges’ and institutes’ strategic plans. Governance structures recognize and respect Indigenous peoples through representation on Boards, Program Advisory Committees, Student Associations through delegated seats for First Nation, Métis and Inuit leaders, and allow for parallel Indigenous Advisory Councils and Elder/Métis Senator Councils. The number of Indigenous employees with ongoing appointments throughout the institution, including Indigenous senior administrators has increased. (20 points)

Evidence that the college or institute has formalized partnerships with First Nations, Métis and Inuit communities, Indigenous institutes of higher learning and Indigenous organizations such as Friendship Centres and Métis Community Councils. Partnerships will be response to economic development and labour market needs and will have evolved from an open and genuine consultation approach. (20 points)

Evidence that the college or institute has implemented curriculum and learning approaches relevant to learners and communities such as: transition and upgrading programs. Examples would be: linkages and partnerships between K-12 and post-secondary education systems; flexibility in the delivery of programs to allow stop-out and start-up options; culturally relevant assessment tools which may differ for First Nation, Métis and Inuit learners; give post-secondary credits for traditional knowledge, as for other skills and areas of expertise. (15 points)

Evidence that the college or institute supports students and employees increased understanding and reciprocity by: integrating the use of Indigenous language and traditional ways of doing and being at events, ceremonies and meetings, and by providing staff and faculty training. (10 points)

Evidence that the college or institute has established environments that are Indigenous-centred, holistic, and that foster learner success through: culturally relevant assessment services; visible and viable culture, language and Elder/Métis Senator involvement; experiences; integrated systems and provisions to eliminate financial barriers. (10 points)

Evidence within the last 5 years of commitment in building the institutional capacity to support SMEs and social innovation in the community. (25 points)

Evidence within the last 5 years of new or improved products, processes, services that enhance profile and market opportunities. (25 points)

Evidence of enhanced collaboration with companies, community partners, local associations and organizations that have a significant and sustainable impact on local or regional innovation. (25 points)

Demonstrated application of skills into workplace settings, with a focus on the capacity to engage in innovation and entrepreneurship activities. Must be supported with data. (25 points)

Your institution supports inbound student mobility by welcoming international students that will contribute to the diversification on campus and/or provides outbound student mobility options for domestic students. (20 points)

Your institution engages in projects with other institutions or organizations abroad. (20 points)

Your institution has faculty who partner with international peers on common research projects and teaching. (20 points)

Your institution identifies and implements innovative opportunities for meaningful relationships with partners overseas. (20 points)

Your institution is able to demonstrate progress made against your institutional internationalization strategy. (20 points)

How did the college or institute establish new or more sustainable and effective practices inspired by the SDGs. Please provide specific examples. (25 points)

What steps did the college or institute take to follow up on their newfound SDG priorities. (25 points)

How and when did the college or institute identify their SDG priorities, and where were the gaps? (20 points)

In what ways do the SDG lens affect education on campus, in your community, and nationally. (15 points)

Share your social media and digital materials, promotional resources, and testimonials that can be combined in one document. (15 points)

Evidence of the steps the college or institute has taken to advance equity, grow diversity, and improve inclusion. Evidence may include links to the business plan, strategic plan, or other relevant documentation. Please identify the relevant excerpt to review by page and paragraph. (30 points)

Evidence that the college or institute has established new or more effective practices that advance equity, grow diversity, improve inclusion, or remove barriers. Please provide specific examples. (30 points)

Evidence of the impact that the college’s or institute’s leadership in EDI has had on students and communities. Please provide data to support the evidence. (30 points)

Share links to relevant statements, campaigns, social media and digital materials, promotional resources that highlight EDI excellence. Evidence may include examples, testimonials from communities and students, and links to or excerpts from relevant statements and partnerships. (10 points)